![]() How we measure quality also differ, with multiple methods for selecting, normalising and aggregating the indicators. The meaning we attribute to quality depends on our own perspective on the healthcare system: for a doctor, quality is not the same as for the manager of a health care establishment, for an insurance provider or for the patients and their experience of the treatment. There is no unique way of defining, conceptualising and measuring quality of care. It also raises a more fundamental issue: the harmonisation of what we mean by quality. However, the proliferation of quality indicators creates more administrative burden for health care organisations and professionals. The list of countries currently includes the European Union Member States, Iceland, Norway, Montenegro, Republic of Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey as well as Albania and North Macedonia.Health Secretary Sajid Javid visits Guys and St Thomas hospital, Juin 2021, © UK Government Various indicators allow the comparison over the time and across countries. It also brings the dimension of Cross-border service delivery, which is a truly European metric. The measurement evaluates the maturity of online public services in terms of User centricity, Transparency, and use of Key enablers. The e-Government Benchmark framework corresponds with the key policy priorities in the e-government Action Plan and the Tallinn Declaration and brings insights on the state-of play of e-government in Europe. The list of countries currently includes the European Union Member States, Iceland, Norway, Montenegro, Republic of Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey as well as Albania and North Macedonia. simplified life events by measuring less services for national users, substantially increasing the amount of services that are measured cross-border, including the Career and the Family life events, and addition of Health life events for odd years together with relabeling of some indicators. The new method presents various changes e.g. The e-Government Benchmark framework reflects on the Digital Decade and it brings insights on the state-of play of e-government in Europe. The e-Government Benchmark framework corresponds with the key policy priorities in the e-government Action Plan, the Tallinn and Berlin Declarations. e-Government Benchmark (from 2020 onwards) Multiple interactive charts allow you to assess countries' profiles.ģ. These indicators allow a comparison of progress across European countries as well as over time. Read reports and methodological notes.Ĭonsult the list of indicators, their definition and sourcesĮntire dataset metadata and download servicesĮuropean Commission services selected various indicators, divided into thematic groups, which illustrate some key dimensions of the European information society (Telecom sector, Broadband, Mobile, Internet usage, Internet services, eGovernment, eCommerce, eBusiness, ICT Skills, Research and Development). ![]() The Digital Economy and Society Index ( DESI) is a composite index that summarises relevant indicators on Europe’s digital performance and tracks the evolution of EU Member States, across five main dimensions: Connectivity, Human Capital, Use of Internet, Integration of Digital Technology, Digital Public Services.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |